Comparison of complications, revisions, spinopelvic parameters, and health-related quality of life after posterior spinal fusion using multiple-rod constructs or two-rod constructs for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis (#SP-3d)
Zhangfu Li
1
,
Honghao Yang
1
,
Yong Hai
1
- Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, BEIJING, China
INTRODUCTION
The incidence of mechanical complications is high in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adult spinal deformity (ASD), especially for cases with severe sagittal malalignment or a prior spinal fusion requiring three-column osteotomy (3-CO) or spinopelvic fixation (SPF). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the complications, revisions, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and surgical data of PSF using multiple-rod constructs to those of two-rod constructs for the treatment of ASD.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Complications, revisions, spinopelvic parameters, HRQoL, and surgical date were compared between patients with ASD who underwent PSF using multiple-rod constructs (multi-rod group) and two-rod constructs (two-rod group).
RESULTS
Ten studies, comprising 797 patients with ASD (399 in the multi-rod group and 398 in the two-rod group), were included. All these studies were retrospective cohort studies. There were no significant differences in the surgical, wound-related, and systemic complications between the groups. In the multi-rod group, we noted a significantly lower incidence of rod fracture (RR, 0.43; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.57, P < 0.001), pseudoarthrosis (RR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.53, P < 0.001), and revisions (RR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.58, P < 0.001); a superior restoration of PI-LL (WMD, 3.96; 95% CI 1.03 to 6.88, P = 0.008) and SVA (WMD, 31.53; 95% CI 21.16 to 41.90, P < 0.001); a better improvement of ODI score (WMD, 6.82; 95% CI 2.33 to 11.31, P = 0.003), SRS-22 total score (WMD, 0.44; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.83, P = 0.024), and VAS-BP score (WMD, 1.02; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.73, P = 0.005).
DISCUSSION
Compared with the two-rod constructs, PSF using multiple-rod constructs was associated with a lower incidence of mechanical complications, a lower revision rate, a superior restoration of sagittal alignment, and a better improvement of HRQoL, without increasing surgical invasiveness. Multiple-rod constructs should be routinely considered to for ASD patients, especially for cases with severe sagittal malalignment or a prior spinal fusion requiring 3-CO or SPF.